Decision - The Pupil Premium in Brighton & Hove schools

skip navigation and tools

Decision details

The Pupil Premium in Brighton & Hove schools

Decision Maker: Children & Young People Committee

Decision status: Recommendations approved

Is Key decision?: No

Is subject to call in?: No

Decisions:

83.1    The Committee considered the report of the Executive Director for Children’s Services, regarding Pupil Premium (PP). The report outlined the national context of the PP, the achievement of the pupils who were in receipt of PP, what school leaders were expected to do and how the local authority was supporting and challenging them. The report was introduced by the Head of Standards and Achievement, Education and Inclusion.

 

83.2    Councillor Wealls noted the information provided in the report and was concerned at the attainment of disadvantaged pupils at Varndean and Longhill secondary schools. The Head of Standards and Achievements Education and Inclusion said that those schools were aware of the issues and were focusing on supporting those vulnerable children.

 

83.3    Councillor Pissaridou noted the figures provided in the report and was concerned that the gap on attainment between those on Free School Meals (FSM) and not on FSM hadn’t really changed since 2011. The Chair said that data was available prior to 2011 and could be provided. The Authority was also concerned at the disparity and had prepared a strategy, ‘Closing the Gap in Educational Achievement for Vulnerable Groups in the City’, (which was provided with the report), and were providing training for school governors and support for Head Teachers.

 

83.4    Maram Takriti noted that the results for Brighton Aldridge Community Academy were very good. The Head of Standards and Achievements Education and Inclusion agreed and said that the Authority had asked the school to share their good practice with others.

 

83.5    Amanda Mortensen asked if all families eligible for FSM were being identified. The Head of Standards and Achievements Education and Inclusion said that schools did their best to do that and the numbers identified had continued to grow.

 

83.6    Councillor Simson suggested that for small schools it might be useful to work in partnership with others, sharing ideas and good practice. Martin Jones thought it would also be useful for school governors to work together. The Assistant Director Education and Inclusion agreed.

 

83.7    RESOLVED: That the Committee noted the report.

 

 

 

 

Report author: Emma Jones

Publication date: 24/03/2015

Date of decision: 09/03/2015

Decided at meeting: 09/03/2015 - Children & Young People Committee

Accompanying Documents:

 


Brighton & Hove City Council | Hove Town Hall | Hove | BN3 3BQ | Tel: (01273) 290000 | Mail: info@brighton-hove.gov.uk | how to find us | comments & complaints