Agenda item - Treasury Management Policy Statement 2016/17 (including Annual Investment Strategy 2016/17) –Mid Year Review

skip navigation and tools

Agenda item

Treasury Management Policy Statement 2016/17 (including Annual Investment Strategy 2016/17) –Mid Year Review

Report of the Executive Director for Finance & Resources (copy attached).

Decision:

1)    That Policy, Resources & Growth Committee endorses the key actions taken during the first half of 2016/17 to meet the treasury management policy statement and practices (including the investment strategy) as set out in this report.

 

2)    That Policy, Resources & Growth Committee notes that the approved maximum indicator for investment risk of 0.05% has been adhered to and the authorised limit and operational boundary have not been exceeded in the first half of the year.

 

Minutes:

81.1         The Committee considered a report of the Executive Director for Finance & Resources in relation to Treasury Management Policy Statement 2016/17 (including Annual Investment Strategy 2016/17) –Mid Year Review. The 2016/17 Treasury Management Policy Statement (TMPS), practices and schedules were approved by the Policy & Resources Committee on 17 March 2016. The TMPS set out the role of Treasury Management, whilst the practices and schedules set out the annual targets and methods by which these targets would be met. It was recommended good and proper practice that Members received half yearly reports and review and endorse treasury management actions during the year. The purpose of the report was to advise of the action taken in the first half of 2015/16.

 

81.2         In response to Councillor Wealls in was explained that, were the Council to have invested in property funds before the Brexit referendum, there would have likely been losses in the short-term, as well as potentially breaching the agreed level of exposure and the impact on the risk indicator; however, it was highlighted that the Council would always carefully consider this indicator before making any financial investment.

 

81.3         In response to Councillor Sykes it was explained that when the Council borrowed it relied heavily on market data; decisions on borrowing were based around cash flow, the funds required and interest rates.

 

81.4         In response to Councillor Janio’s queries about under-borrowing, it was clarified that this related to instances where the Council borrowed from its own cash reserves. The Council had now moved away from this approach generally as it had a substantial amount of under-borrowing, but now also wanted to take advantage of low interest rates, and be prevented from having to borrow when interest rates were higher.

 

81.5         Councillor A. Norman formally thanked the Treasury Management Team, and highlighted the importance for the city of having a sound investment strategy.

 

81.6         The Chair then put the recommendations to the vote.

 

81.7         RESOLVED:

 

1)     That the Committee endorses the key actions taken during the first half of 2016/17 to meet the treasury management policy statement and practices (including the investment strategy) as set out in this report.

 

2)     That the Committee notes that the approved maximum indicator for investment risk of 0.05% has been adhered to and the authorised limit and operational boundary have not been exceeded in the first half of the year.

Supporting documents:

 


Brighton & Hove City Council | Hove Town Hall | Hove | BN3 3BQ | Tel: (01273) 290000 | Mail: info@brighton-hove.gov.uk | how to find us | comments & complaints